Chapter I — Clients
Accounts from the Clients We Have Worked With
verdantid has worked with founders, directors, and in-house teams across Malaysia. The following accounts reflect a range of engagements across our three areas of practice.
Back to Home140+
Engagements Completed
8
Years in Practice
4.8
Average Client Rating
94%
Repeat & Referred Clients
Chapter II — Testimonials
What Clients Have Said
Siti Lailah Marzuki
Director, Petaling Jaya
"We used verdantid for the formation of our Sdn Bhd last March. What I appreciated most was the intake call — they asked questions I hadn't considered, particularly around future share allocations. The constitution they drafted reflected what we actually wanted rather than a generic template. The handover note was also useful when we returned to it six months later."
April 2025 — Company Formation
Tan Huat Keong
Managing Director, Kuala Lumpur
"I had a distribution agreement that needed review before we signed with a new supplier. The marked-up version came back with notes on each clause that explained what each one meant in practice and flagged two points I wouldn't have noticed. The timeline was a little tighter than expected, though the team communicated throughout so we weren't left waiting without updates."
March 2025 — Commercial Contracts
Nurhafiza Rashid
Company Secretary, Shah Alam
"The board advisory programme gave our directors a proper foundation for how meetings should run and what their obligations actually are. We had been operating informally for years and the written guidance on conflicts of interest particularly helped clarify some situations we had been handling inconsistently."
April 2025 — Board Advisory
Vikram Menon
Founder, Bangsar South
"I was incorporating for the first time and had questions about whether I needed a constitution at all and how to structure the shareholding between two founders. The intake conversation answered those questions before any documents were drafted. The final package was clear, and the handover memorandum explained the reasoning in plain terms."
March 2025 — Company Formation
Lim Kai Wen
Operations Manager, Subang Jaya
"We needed a joint venture agreement drafted quickly for a new relationship with an overseas supplier. The turnaround was reasonable given the complexity involved and the notes on the liability clauses were particularly helpful for explaining the reasoning to our finance team, who had separate concerns."
April 2025 — Commercial Contracts
Ahmad Bahari Ismail
Non-Executive Director, Kuala Lumpur
"I have sat on several boards over the years and the governance programme was the most structured approach to director obligations I have encountered outside of a formal training setting. The scheduled touchpoints suited me well — it gave me time to raise questions from actual board situations rather than abstract scenarios."
March 2025 — Board Advisory
Chapter III — Case Studies
Three Engagement Accounts
Case Study 01 — Company Formation
A Professional Partnership Incorporating Into Corporate Form
The Situation
Three partners in a small consulting practice had been operating as a partnership for six years. They were considering incorporation but were uncertain about how to allocate shares, whether they needed a constitution, and how to document the transition from their existing arrangement.
How verdantid Assisted
The intake conversation established that the partners had different views on future share allocation in the event one partner wished to exit. verdantid drafted a constitution addressing those arrangements specifically, along with the standard incorporation documentation. An initial shareholders' resolution was prepared to reflect the transition from the prior partnership structure.
Outcome
The company was incorporated within eight working days of scope confirmation. The partners received a handover memorandum summarising the constitutional provisions relevant to share transfers, which they were able to refer to independently when a related question arose four months later.
"The constitution actually addressed a question we hadn't thought to ask." — Client, Kuala Lumpur
Case Study 02 — Commercial Contracts
A Service Agreement Review Before a New Client Relationship
The Situation
A small software development firm had been asked to sign a service agreement prepared by a significantly larger client. The agreement contained intellectual property assignment clauses and limitation of liability provisions that the founders were uncertain about but felt reluctant to challenge without understanding their significance.
How verdantid Assisted
The review identified three points warranting particular attention: a broadly drafted IP assignment that would have covered pre-existing materials, a liability cap set below the contract value, and a termination clause with no notice period for convenience termination. Notes explained the practical implications of each and suggested alternative wording for each point.
Outcome
The firm approached the client with two of the three suggested amendments. Both were accepted. The engagement fee represented a small fraction of the contract value and the founders felt they entered the relationship with a clearer understanding of their position.
"The notes made it possible to have a conversation with the client rather than simply refusing to sign." — Director, Selangor
Case Study 03 — Board Advisory
A Family Business Preparing for an External Investor
The Situation
A second-generation family business was in discussions with a private equity investor who had raised concerns about the company's governance arrangements, including the absence of a conflict-of-interest policy and the informal manner in which board decisions had been documented.
How verdantid Assisted
The advisory programme was structured over four months with scheduled touchpoints aligned to the investor's due diligence timeline. Deliverables included a board charter, a conflict-of-interest framework, a template for board minutes, and written guidance on resolutions. Three past decisions were also reviewed and documented retrospectively at the investor's request.
Outcome
The investor's governance concerns were addressed within the due diligence period. The company proceeded to close the investment round. The board charter and conflict-of-interest framework are now in active use with the incoming investor-appointed director on the board.
"The structured timeline meant we were ahead of what the investor expected." — Chairman, Kuala Lumpur
Chapter IV — Contact
Reach the Practice
Telephone
+60 3-2783 4621Address
Suite 18-03, Menara Hap Seng, Jalan P. Ramlee, 50250 Kuala Lumpur
Hours
Mon–Fri: 9:00 am – 6:00 pm
Sat: 9:00 am – 1:00 pm
Chapter V — Begin
Considering a verdantid Engagement?
The most useful next step is a short initial conversation about your matter. Send a brief description through the contact form and we will respond within one working day.
Contact the Practice